


At best, it's my feeling that the right path is one that deals in specifics about our personal experiences with the game, even though there's no guarantee that the reader will have an identical one. As gaming spreads out and its audience's tastes diverge more and more, no one review can possibly serve everyone's needs.

Most of the popular styles of game reviews that are employed by outlets today are less valid than they used to be, since attempts at singular authority and true objectivity make the insane assumption that there's a "right" answer to the game review question. Similarly, we still don't know enough about you to accurately tell you if you'll like this or not.I'm not really here to defend "the game review." In fact, I think most of them could be better.
